Category talk:Technology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Computing is not subordinate to engineering
Computing (computer science and software engineering) are in no way subordinate to engineering. The computing professions are huge. In the U.S., there are more CS professors than all engineering professors. The software engineering page has a long section about why software engineering is independent from engineering.
Remedies: Either add computing on the category list like engineering, or move engineering down into the technology list, as opposed to the title.. ---
These category pages have popped everywhere but I cannot see where we can discuss if they are a good idea. Is there a talk category somewhere?--BozMo|talk 13:25, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia_talk:Categorization JesseW 08:44, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
| Contents |
The picture
While the picture is nice, shouldn't it go on an article or category about the History of Technology, not technology in general? JesseW 08:44, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Also on my firefox it overlaps other stuff, anyone know how to fix that?MarSch 10:05, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
At edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Technology&diff=prev&oldid=10066053 , an anonymous user added this line:
Technology also has become an accepted part of Millenials lifes.
Who or what is "Millenials"? --DavidCary 05:24, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Parents of Technology
In the classic categorization schemes like Dewey Decimal and Library of Congress, Technology aka Applied Sciences is one of the fundamental categories. As such, does it really make sense to have Technology as a child of Humans, Culture, etc.? Tom Haws 22:06, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)
motivation for supporting multiprogramming in an os
Lock this page?
Over the last couple of days this page has come under consistant attack from spammers placing dozens of viagra ads at the top. Hopefully if it remains locked for a couple of days, they'll be deterred.
